September 1, 2012

Ketchup Forsooth!

Shit just has not been amenable to blogging of late.  You know, busy things and whatnot.

Running has necessarily been reduced to elliptical only until September 25th.  Stress fracture and all that nonsense.  Bah.  It sounds like a bunch of fuckquackery to me.  Yet I abstain.  I'm getting fat, I tell ya!  I can FEEL the fatness creeping into my ass.  All upon my chubby fat thighs and ooky nasty tummy.

Irregardless.

Ir.
Re.
Gard.
Less.

Eeewww!  Do you smell that?  The rotting smell of poorly taxidermied neologisms.  Amiright?!

I've been far too busy sweating character synopses and plot twists, capturing them through shoddy-fashioned construction paper funnels so that they spill onto a page with some sort of organization. 

I have two stories going at once.  The second I am outlining with the zeal of a shit-flinging monkey in preparation for NaNoWriMo while trying so very hard not to actually begin the prose.

The main character of my first remains ever stuck hog-tied on a bus waiting patiently for........ exactly.

To speak of reading lists!

Nicole said, "You know, I have a huge problem with the whole well read means you have to have read "the classics." I think it's BS."

I completely agree.  I'd rather poke out my eyes with an icepick than suffer through A Tale of Two Cities.   I've read a bit of Shakespeare- Eh.  Dickens is as exciting as a pet rock.  And Ayn Rand totally fucking rubs me the wrong way.  I think my use of the term "classics" was a misnomer.  Perhaps I should have said "popular"  or  "oft-read."  Or maybe just, "books I've always wanted to read but never got the chance."  Which is why the kid and I are making our own list.

I know it is probably blasphemy, but Hemingway does nothing for me.  Thoreau?  Unimpressed.  Neither Bronte light any fires.  Nor does Jane Austen.  As horribly anti-feminist as it sounds, most female writers bore me straight to fucking tears.  Or, they just piss me off with their feminist and/or depressing undertones. 

Another point, though.  Something that has run through my mind since I was a kid.  I worry often that reading too much would affect my writing in a negative way.  That I would (unconsciously) begin rehashing and reusing and recycling.  Yes, most "original" ideas are simply defined as such because enough time has passed since the last time they were thought of.  But I can still try, yes?  I am hoping it doesn't happen.  I am hoping that I will reap some benefits from it all.  If nothing else but the satisfaction of being "well read."  Or at least my definition of "well read."

I read Animal Farm yesterday.  A nice little fable.  Scathing, pessimistic.  I read 1984 when I was a kid, so I was already familiar with his writing style.  He uses one sentence to tell a story it would take me an entire chapter to tell.  I've never been a huge fan.  But I get it.

Next up is Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. 

And to the lovely Ms. Faustus-

I've read all of Poe.  The kid's read him, too.  He's added some Lovecraft to the list and is trying to wrangle me into a Sherlock Holmes marathon complete with reenactments.

The Iliad, check.

Is Crime and Punishment worth it?  

I've got Slaughterhouse Five on the list.

Randomly- 

A Clockwork Orange is on there, but it may be an exercise in futility.

Keep James Joyce as far away from me as possible.  I'd rather donate my kidney to a cannibal.

The kid's added The Divine Comedy.

Please.  Keep going.  We're only up to #17!



And with that, I shall invite you into my week. 







This is a picture of my new boots.  (For those of you who were not fortunate enough to be privy to such when I plastered them on Facebook.)















Here is a picture of the chair that does not exist (which is an inside joke between myself and my murderous offspring).  Boot store.  Cheetah print.  Shoe.  Chair.   Be perfectly still and don't look it in the eye.  It's vision is based on movement. Look away!










This is what a $20 package of Reese's Peanut Butter cups looks like.  A 1-pound chimera of chocolate/peanut butter blasphemy.  That's the second time I have used that word in this blog post.  For those of you keeping up.









This is a picture of how Jake answered the door when Mormons came a'callin'. 

In response to, "Are your parents home?"

He responded, "I guess you can say that.... but.... they're not very talkative.... mmmm.... I'm thirsty." (as copied directly from his text)





 And here is what "any random afternoon" will look like in approximately 18 months. 











This is a picture of my sunburned boobs that Sarge took while we were sitting in a daiquiri bar called Wet Willies.  Sarge drank a sour apple daiquiri while, obviously, taking down-the-shirt pictures of my sunburned boobs.

(And you didn't think I'd post it.  After 18 years, you should know better than to dare me). 

7 comments:

  1. Yay .. another awesome read, but let me clear up a few things .. lmao

    you have mentioned shit flinging monkeys so many times, that i would like some kind of evidence (i.e a picture of some sort)
    I hope harper lee is not on you list of bore-me-to-fucking-tears list (lmao).
    What the fuck is the definition of chimera, because the only chimera i know is a dude that plays in the nhl (lmao)
    other than that .. congratulations on being brave enough to finally post a gratuitous down the shirt shot, im sure plenty of your male readers have been patiently waiting for that (lmao).

    And your still a rockstar in every sense of the word

    Cheers .. ~Adam~

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I dunno about the monkeys. Sometimes I just get stuck on something and say it til I wear it out. Like that time I got stuck on the word "pathetic" in 6th or 7th grade. I probably said it 10 times a day for a year. Shit-flinging monkeys will be replaced by some other invented colloquialism in time, surely.

      A chimera is a person/animal/thing with 2 sets of DNA. Or at least that is the definition I meant to use here. There is also a chimera in mythology which is some sort of lion beast thingy.

      He actually tried to get an up-the-shorts shot but I closed my legs real fast ;-)

      Delete
  2. If your looking for a book. I suggest Flannery O Connor A good man is hard to find. It is very sinister. Also, not boring. You have some of the same reading taste I do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Went and checked out the synopsis and I am totally sold. It's in my Amazon shopping cart. Thanks SO MUCH!

      Delete
  3. Thank you for the quote. I am honored. :-)

    Dr. Faustus by Christopher Marlowe. Blows ANY Shakespeare out of the water ANY day. And if the kids are asking for the Divine Comedy and the Iliad, they'll like Faustus.

    I'm re-reading Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston. I love that book. I'm not sure it'll appeal to the boys, but they might find it interesting as a historical fiction piece. And the way the dialect is written is absolutely astounding.

    Faulkner's A Light in August is awesome too.
    Kafka Metamorphosis
    John Fowles The Magus (that's some crazy shit. really good tho!)
    John Irving A Prayer for Owen Meany

    Ok, I'm done. LMK what you think! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just because I go back to commenting on posts I've missed...

    J.L. Borges,if nothing else then his Ficciones. He described himself as first and foremost a reader, then a poet, and then a writer of prose.

    It all depends on what you want to do with writing. Writing walks that beautiful line between art and craft, and the craft requires familiarity with technique, at least in one's genre of interest. There is no innocent [=blind] writing, because we are all readers first.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Very true. And I think the key is to know yourself well enough, have already developed your own writing voice soundly enough, and be aware enough so that you can read without subconsciously internalizing it too much. I don't think I could have done it a couple years ago. But now, I feel much more solid.

    ReplyDelete

Suck on my crap